Social preview
How it looks when shared
Fix these first
Ranked by conversion impactReplace the 5-field contact form in the hero with a single-field email capture or a two-step button that says 'Get My Free Quote in 60 Seconds' - then collect details on the next page. Reducing the hero form from 5 fields (Full Name, Business Name, Email, Telephone, Project Details) to 1 field will immediately lower friction and increase form starts by an estimated 30-50%.
Add a pricing anchor section. You do not need exact prices - add a 'Starting from 999 EUR' or package tier (Basic / Business / eCommerce) with price ranges. Cold visitors from paid ads will not fill out a form without any price signal. Place this section directly above the 'Get Your Free Quote' form.
Change both CTA buttons from the vague 'GET IN TOUCH' to outcome-specific copy like 'Get My Free Website Quote' or 'See Pricing and Get a Quote'. 'GET IN TOUCH' reads like a contact page link, not a conversion action, and kills urgency for cold traffic.
Category breakdown
Both CTAs say 'GET IN TOUCH' - this is the weakest possible CTA for a paid traffic landing page. It signals no urgency, no specific outcome, and no value exchange. The hero already contains a full 5-field form, so having a button that also says 'GET IN TOUCH' creates redundancy and confusion about what action to take. There is no secondary CTA (e.g. 'See Our Work' or 'View Pricing') for visitors not yet ready to commit.
There are 6 named Google reviews via Trustindex with real names and detailed copy - this is genuinely good. The 4.9/5 Google rating and '500+ businesses launched' claim appear in the hero. However, there are no customer logos, no photos of reviewers, no video testimonials, and critically no last names or business names attached to most reviews (Romy Muntingh and Paddy Lehane are exceptions). 'Jeff W' and 'Bob Vickers' without company context feel anonymous. There is also no press mention or third-party validation beyond Google reviews.
The page has a phone number (01-5563943) and email in the footer, a security mention, and Google reviews. The founder's name (Kieran) appears in reviews but there is no About section, no photo of Kieran, no company registration number, and no physical address visible in the scraped content. For a service costing likely 1,000-5,000 EUR, cold visitors need to see a face. There is no money-back guarantee, no pricing, and no mention of contract terms. The 'Dublin's top-rated team' claim is unsubstantiated.
The H1 'A Website That Wins You Customers' is benefit-oriented and readable in 3 seconds, which is above average. The subheadline 'Live in 10 Days' adds a strong differentiator. However, the combination does not immediately answer 'for whom' - a Dublin small business owner vs. an enterprise vs. an eCommerce brand all read this the same way. The supporting bullet points (free logo, mobile-responsive, 10 days, hosting included) do solid work but are below the fold on mobile.
The page structure suggests significant mobile friction. A 5-field form in the hero section will dominate the entire first screen on mobile, pushing the bullet point benefits (free logo, 10 days, hosting) below the fold before the visitor has read them. The '4.9/5 on Google' and '500+ businesses launched' social proof badges are likely rendered in small text that gets lost on a 375px screen. The hero CTA and form competing for space is a classic mobile conversion killer.
The page does communicate real differentiators - 10-day turnaround, free logo, no templates, hosting included, 4.9/5 on Google, 500+ businesses launched. These are strong. But they are listed as bullet points rather than being dramatized. The '500+ businesses launched' claim is buried in small text near the form and never expanded on. There is no before/after story, no outcome metric (e.g. 'clients report X% more leads'), and no explanation of what makes Grange different from the 50 other Dublin web design agencies.